General Theological Seminary |
The gist of this article by Tom
Ehrich (an Episcopal priest and “church consultant”) is that GTS’s
embarrassingly public meltdown is symptomatic of a crisis spreading throughout
the world of denominational seminaries.
From my experience, his analysis is right on the money and certainly
applies to the seminaries of my own Lutheran denomination (ELCA).
For years I have participated in
meetings and conversations on the impossibility of sustaining our church's theological
schools as they have been constituted. They cost too much and we have too many
of them have been the most obvious problems. Pastor salaries are too low for
seminary graduates to pay off their student loans. Dropping enrollments make
the individual schools (financially stressed in my day) impossible to maintain.
Yet the can has just kept being kicked down the road. Now a crisis state is
forcing schools into shotgun mergers and consolidations, or outright closure.
As Ehrich goes on to say, the
crisis of the seminaries is paralleled by the crisis of congregations. Together
they are facing shrinking resources and confusion about their purpose. Culture
has changed and drastically so when it comes to religion. Most of these
institutions have resisted the changes as long as possible, until now when many
are simply being swept away.
What Ehrich doesn’t say, however,
is that the seminaries bear a special responsibility for the crisis of the
church, especially the decline of US mainline denominations. For decades these
generally liberal schools taught their ministry students contemporary theology
and critical biblical studies which together exposed much of traditional
Christianity as irrelevant to, or in denial of, the modern world. Yet apart
from the classroom and student lounge debates, this information fell lifeless
to the floor. Rarely were students encouraged to actually apply this knowledge
in their future congregational ministries. In fact, usually the message was quite
the reverse: keep this to yourself lest you upset the folks in the pews.
Seminaries have stood out uniquely as institutions of professional training by giving
students information they aren’t actually supposed to use.
The result has been clergy by the
thousands handicapped from the start in not having the tools to respond creatively
to a rapidly changing world. While using more adult language, their preaching
essentially repackages ideas they learned in Sunday school. The Bible continues
to be interpreted with a naïve realism, even when they are aware of alternative
modern critical understandings. Ancient church creeds and doctrines continue to
be propounded, however irrational or meaningless they have become.
Amazingly, and tragically, even
now nothing has really changed. In the midst of crisis, churches and seminaries
look only for ways to trim and adapt their operations to new fiscal realities.
Rarely, if ever, do they consider whether in these times fundamental change
might actually be called for. Seminaries have been in possession of the ideas
that could have ignited a transformation of the church into relevant and
dynamic social institutions. They didn’t use them and now are paying the price for
remaining aboard a sinking ship.
Afterword: Here is a related blog post I wrote almost five years ago. As I say above, this conversation has been going on a long time: Re-cutting the Seminary Pie.
Afterword: Here is a related blog post I wrote almost five years ago. As I say above, this conversation has been going on a long time: Re-cutting the Seminary Pie.
2 comments:
I agree with just about everything you say here, and sympathize with all of it, but I'm not sure that if the seminaries and churches had joined together in teaching an updated version of religion, it would have helped the decline. The (what seems to me to be) dis-confirming example is: The Unitarian Universalist Association. They have no such reluctance at dropping out-dated beliefs and worldviews, and they are a presence, but hardly a mega-denomination. Probably there are more Baptists in any one Southern state, than UU's the the whole country. I don't know how the traditional denominations can stem their decline, but the UU case makes me unable to argue that going more modern is the solution. What do you think?
Thanks for your comment Michael (and sorry for taking so long to respond). Interestingly, the UUA has actually done pretty well, holding its own or even growing in the past 30 years or so--much better than any mainline denomination. Nonetheless, I don't deny that some shrinkage was inevitable. Had seminaries embraced contemporary theology and its challenges, however, I think their would have been new energy and a significant improvement in the quality of church life. Frankly, most mainline congregations and their pastors are stale--and still shrinking.
Post a Comment